Reading and Writing Excellence Program

Un espacio seguro y valiente para abordar las inequidades

Autores/as

  • Elaine Khoo University of Toronto Scarborough
  • Xiangying Huo University of Toronto Scarborough

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25071/2818-2618.10

Palabras clave:

estudiantes multilingües, pedagogía culturalmente receptiva, integridad académica, centros de escritura, programas cocurriculares, agencia del estudiante

Resumen

El aumento de la diversidad cultural, lingüística y socioeconómica en las poblaciones estudiantiles exige abordar las inequidades que enfrentan los estudiantes multilingües para quienes el inglés funciona como tercera, cuarta o quinta lengua. Estos estudiantes suelen ser percibidos desde lentes deficitarias basadas en valores coloniales occidentales y considerados necesitados de remediación en lectura y escritura académicas. El programa Reading and Writing Excellence (RWE), una iniciativa extracurricular sin créditos, aplica un enfoque de empoderamiento mediante un modelo dirigido por el estudiante y facilitado por el instructor. Busca reducir inequidades al involucrar a los estudiantes en prácticas que promueven la integridad académica y fortalecen su competencia en inglés académico, ayudándoles a construir identidades de aprendizaje más seguras. Este artículo revisa críticamente el programa, destacando su misión, fundamentos pedagógicos y efectividad para crear entornos inclusivos mediante retroalimentación personalizada e interacciones centradas en el estudiante, demostrando su potencial como modelo transferible para otras instituciones.

 

Biografía del autor/a

Elaine Khoo, University of Toronto Scarborough

Elaine Khoo, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor (Teaching Stream) at the University of Toronto
Scarborough (UTSC). She founded the English Language Development (ELD) support program to proactively address diverse language development needs in ways that counter the deficit
narrative of students with low English language proficiency. She has incorporated her research
interests, which include positive pedagogy in higher education, internationalization, technology-supported language learning, inclusive practices in academic integrity, language learning
motivation, second language writing, and vocabulary studies, into ELD programs to empower
students to gain accelerated progress in academic reading, writing, and oral communication.

Xiangying Huo, University of Toronto Scarborough

Xiangying Huo, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor at University of Toronto Scarborough. She was a professor of English in China for over a decade and a visiting scholar at Michigan State University. She has taught academic writing across the curriculum at the University of Toronto, York University, and OCAD Art and Design University in the past ten years. Xiangying’s research interests include writing studies, applied linguistics, ESL/EFL policy and pedagogy, Writing Center studies, anti-racism education, language ideology, World Englishes, intercultural and cross-cultural teaching and learning, and internationalization in higher education. She has presented her research widely at national and international conferences and is the author of Higher Education Internationalization and English Language Instruction: Intersectionality of Race and Language in Canadian Universities (2020, Springer). Xiangying is passionate about discovering students’ strengths, voices, and agency and customizing her pedagogy to help her students thrive on their academic journeys.

Citas

Beasley, E. M. (2016). Comparing the demographics of students reported for academic dishonesty to those of the overall student population. Ethics & Behavior, 26(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2014.978977

Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Rozenberg, P., Saddiqui, S., & van Haeringen, K. (2019). Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university students. Studies in Higher Education, 44(11), 1837–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788

Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407

Eaton, S. E. (2022). New priorities for academic integrity: Equity, diversity, inclusion, decolonization and Indigenization. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18(1), 10, s40979-022-00105–0. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00105-0

Eaton, S. E., & Burns, A. (2018). Exploring the intersection between culturally responsive pedagogy and academic integrity among EAL students in Canadian higher education. J. of Educational Thought, 51(3), 339–359.

Ellis, N., Romer, & O’Donnell. (2016). Constructions and usage-based approaches to language acquisition: Usage-based approaches to language acquisition Chp 1. Language Learning, 66(S1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.1_12177

Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed). Teachers College.

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (Third edition) [Electronic resource]. Teachers College Press.

Heng, T. T. (2018). Coping Strategies of International Chinese Undergraduates in Response to Academic Challenges in U.S. Colleges. Teachers College Record, 120(Feb 2018), 1–42.

Huo, X. (2020). Higher education internationalization and English language instruction: Intersectionality of race and language in Canadian universities. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60599-5

Huo, X., & Khoo, E. (2022). Effective teaching strategies for Chinese international students at a Canadian university: An online reading-writing support program. In C. Smith & G. Zhou (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching Strategies for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse International Students (pp. 241–264). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8921-2.ch013

Jabbar, A., & Hardaker, G. (2013). The role of culturally responsive teaching for supporting ethnic diversity in British University Business Schools. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.725221

Khoo, E., & Huo, X. (2022a). Toward transformative inclusivity through learner-driven and instructor-facilitated writing support: An innovative approach to empowering English language learners. Journal of Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie (in Press).

Khoo, E., & Huo, X. (2022b). The Efficacy of Culturally Responsive Pedagogy for Low-Proficiency International Students in Online Teaching and Learning: A Canadian Experience with an Online Reading-Writing Program. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v16i2.7022

Khoo, E., & Kang, S. (2022). Proactive learner empowerment: Towards a transformative academic integrity approach for English language learners. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00111-2

Kilburn, M., Radu, B. M., & Henckell, M. (2019). Conceptual and Theoretical Frameworks for CRT Pedagogy. In L. Kyei-Blankson, J. Blankson, & E. Ntuli (Eds.), Care and Culturally Responsive Pedagogy in Online Settings: (pp. 1–21). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7802-4

Krasnof, B. (2016). Culturally responsive teaching: A guide to evidence-based practices for teaching all students equitably. Region X Equity Assistance Center at Education Northwest.

Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). It’s Not the Culture of Poverty, It’s the Poverty of Culture: The Problem with Teacher Education. Anthropology Education Quarterly, 37(2), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2006.37.2.104

Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally Relevant Pedagogy 2.0: A.k.a. the Remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751

Mathrani, A., Han, B., Mathrani, S., Jha, M., & Scogings, C. (2021). Interpreting academic integrity transgressions among learning communities. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00073-x

Nation, P. (2020). The different aspects of vocabulary knowledge. In S. A. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 15–29). New York : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Perkins, M., Gezgin, U. B., & Roe, J. (2018). Understanding the relationship between language ability and plagiarism in non-native English speaking business students. Journal of Academic Ethics, 16(4), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-018-9311-8

Rogerson, A. M. (2017). Detecting contract cheating in essay and report submissions: Process, patterns, clues and conversations. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-017-0021-6

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Walker, R. A. (2010). Sociocultural Issues in Motivation. In International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 712–717). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00629-1

Walker-Gleaves, C. (2019). Is Caring Pedagogy Really So Progressive? Exploring the Conceptual and Practical Impediments to Operationalizing Care in Higher Education. In P. Gibbs & A. Peterson (Eds.), Higher Education and Hope: Institutional, Pedagogical and Personal Possibilities (pp. 93–112). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13566-9

Xing, D., & Bolden, B. (2021). Learning at Half Capacity: The Academic Acculturation Reality Experienced by Chinese International Students. In V. Tavares (Ed.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on international student experience in Canadian higher education (pp. 41–61). IGI Global.

Yasin, F. (2021). The agents of autonomy in decolonising pedagogy: An analysis of autonomy-facilitating approaches to anti-deficit, critical, and culturally responsive education for marginalised women in Ontario, Canada. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1949632

Zimmerman, B. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.

Publicado

2026-03-19

Cómo citar

Khoo, E., & Huo, X. (2026). Reading and Writing Excellence Program: Un espacio seguro y valiente para abordar las inequidades. SKRIB, 3(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.25071/2818-2618.10

Número

Sección

Open call to SKRIB

Artículos similares

1 2 > >> 

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.